I think middle class is above the poverty level, and the reason there is question on the higher end is because there is no "line" drawn like there is with poverty.
I mean, my inclination is to say that anyone not living paycheck-to-paycheck is above the poverty level, but I had a friend making $90K as a single woman in AZ who was living paycheck-to-paycheck, so that definition doesn't seem to work.
I would say that all of us digi scrappers are probably in the middle class because we can afford a computer with a program and to buy supplies for it. The Upper Class is harder to define. There are people like Mitt Romney and Warren Buffett who don't have to work because of their Capitol Gains, and that is considered upper class, but what about the big CEO's who still put in 40+ hour weeks? Do they HAVE to, or are they just that kind of people?
DH works as an optical engineer trying to fix the process on the production lines of the various laser products, so he works daily with immigrants who simply have to put things together. One of them told him that he is so lucky that he is an engineer and that we can afford for me to stay home with our kids, yet we can still afford to fly out for my sister's wedding even though we had already made our annual trip out west. Later in that conversation they discovered in round-about terms that her and her husbands combined income was more than ours.
I think we are all human and see what other people can afford that we can't, but in reality the standard of living is going way up all across the board. Some people give up a nicer living situation for smart phones and cable, but those are pretty nice luxuries, ya know? And we may be digi scrapping instead of going on a trip to Barbados.
