I have to agree with those who say it is regional. I grew up dirt poor, on welfare. I know poor. But middle class? Well, my husband and I are both full time professionals. We both put ourselves through college on our own dime (no parental contribution) and had some very lean years to reach where we are today. Together, we earn slightly under that upper range (<200k) We live in a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath home, about 2000 sq. ft. Nice, but not extravagant by any means. We drive two older cars - mine has 130,000 miles on it, his has over 220,000 miles. Repairs lately have been costly. None of our girls got cars when they turned 16. In fact, none of them yet has a car! I buy my clothes at Kohls and JCPenney, not Neiman Marcus or Ann Taylor. We just put one daughter through college without incurring debt. We went several years without any vacations to pull that off. We now have 2 in college. If it wasn't for the fact that one is in community college, we'd be living on rice and ramen noodles this year! Since the economy tanked 4-5 years ago, we've been paycheck to paycheck just keeping up with expenses and not able to save except for what is taken out of our paychecks for 401K, most of which is lost every year. A year ago my husband lost his job (layoffs, downsizing). He was able to find employment, but it was a 30% cut in pay from what he had been earning. This seems to be the new normal. And yet, the government, in its infinite wisdom, has declared that my children are not eligible for any aid for college and that we should be able to afford $50K/year (EFC). Huh? Because the EFC means the entire cost is out of pocket, we've had to limit the younger two to state schools even though the older one went to a private college (she had a sizeable academic scholarship). It is all we can afford without incurring massive debt. So yes, I fit the definition of [upper] middle class if you go strictly by the numbers, but where I live (northeast) the money just doesn't go that far. And don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining at all. I consider us to fit the "comfortable" range, but not rich, and I'm quite content being "comfortable." If I could transplant my income to the south I'm sure I'd be considered wealthy. I know housing costs are way less. On the other hand, if I tried to live on my income in California, I'd be struggling. So it's all subjective.